|
Written by Dr Eytan Ellenber
|
|
Wednesday, 10 May 2006 |
|
The ability to effectively control hospital-acquired infections is essential to the security of patients and the quality of care in the hospital environment. In fact, the control of such infections is the best indicator of the quality of care in any given hospital. The hospital has been and always will be an environment vulnerable to infections.
Whereas three hundred years ago, they spoke of “hospital fever”, or “ we now speak of nosocomial infection.
In order to efficiently control infection risk in the hospital environment, a detailed plan is required to identify, analyse and reduce the risk of infection. This necessitates a broad approach based on information sharing among all health care professional involved in the prevention of hospital-acquired infections.
Read more: article in the Lancet
Dr Eytan Ellenberg
Public Health Physician - Master Degree in “Risk Management in the Hospital Environment” from L’École Centrale de Paris – Bachelor in “Communication, Technology and Power” from The Political Sciences Faculty at Paris 1 University Pantheon Sorbonne. Presently studying for a PHD in Language Sciences at the University of Paris III under the supervision of Professor Loïc Depecker. Dr Eytan Ellenberg is also Medical Consultant for a Communication and Public Relation Agency.
Other Publications “Danger, hospital” – Armand Collin (2005)
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
|
|
|
Written by Christine Besson
|
|
Saturday, 21 May 2005 |
|
Dr. Ignaz Semmelweiss: an unrecognized genius
in his time.
Ignaz
Semmelweiss was a doctor in a Vienna general hospital in 1845 where women could
give birth in two departments: one served by midwifes and their students and
the other managed by doctors and medical students. In the second department,
puerperal infections (caught during delivery) were devastating for the women.
The mortality rate exceeded 30% there while in the other department the
mortality rate rarely exceeded 1 or 2%. Even the poor women who delivered in
the street did not have higher mortality rates.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|